Northern Ireland Outdoors Forum - Hiking, camping and more

General => General Chat => Topic started by: mregan on March 05, 2013

Title: The Gondola proposal
Post by: mregan on March 05, 2013
http://www.enjoythemournes.com/calread2.asp?id=80

Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Rusty Madra on March 05, 2013
Sweet.... Now every Frankie from Belfast on their holidays will be able to discard their empty buckfast bottles at the top of Donard and harass hikers with crys of "Here Mister... Gis a feg"  >:(
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Wolf_Larson on March 06, 2013
Great for people not that able to meet the top
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Mourneman on March 06, 2013
Having read all the reports into this Gondola proposal it clearly states that they would only be allowed The gondola as far as the forest line,& at the minute there are two main sites consIdered,drinnahilly & The quarry below Thomas mountain.Truth be told I'd prefer no gondola,all the right of access for families & disabled is just been used to push it through,as we're lucky enough that the Mournes can already be accessed by families & disabled folk with roads already cutting right through & silent valley park that has outstanding views.
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Rusty Madra on March 06, 2013
We'll need to feed all these new pilgrims so a McDonalds up there will be needed: maybe beside the gift shop... It'll create jobs for the local community too. They'll also need a few spaces to park all the cars too so maybe we'll reclaim a bit of land for extra car parking.

There's a few quid to be made from schools so maybe we'll build an education centre too.  Even more money in the residentials so a few Dorms and apartments will be needed to be built.

Of course what will people do when the weathers bad? ... Best build a welcome centre too. Before that tho we'll have to sort out a few basics like water and power so the ground will have to be dug up. Maybe put some high speed fiber optics down while we're at at.

And on and on.... Until we've consumed the landscape totally
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: LennyJ1 on March 06, 2013
I like the idea.

It would bring in some well needed torisim and to be honest it will only affect a small percentage of the mournes.

Just when all the building work is being done they need to consider the re-consevation of the area. When the Morne path was installed I was a bit aprehensive but that turned out really well.

Besides, its not going to be another Cairngorms is it ???
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Mourneman on March 06, 2013
We'll need to feed all these new pilgrims so a McDonalds up there will be needed: maybe beside the gift shop... It'll create jobs for the local community too. They'll also need a few spaces to park all the cars too so maybe we'll reclaim a bit of land for extra car parking.

There's a few quid to be made from schools so maybe we'll build an education centre too.  Even more money in the residentials so a few Dorms and apartments will be needed to be built.

Of course what will people do when the weathers bad? ... Best build a welcome centre too. Before that tho we'll have to sort out a few basics like water and power so the ground will have to be dug up. Maybe put some high speed fiber optics down while we're at at.

And on and on.... Until we've consumed the landscape totally

you're right on the ball mate,well said
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: spin on March 06, 2013
We'll need to feed all these new pilgrims so a McDonalds up there will be needed: maybe beside the gift shop... It'll create jobs for the local community too. They'll also need a few spaces to park all the cars too so maybe we'll reclaim a bit of land for extra car parking.

There's a few quid to be made from schools so maybe we'll build an education centre too.  Even more money in the residentials so a few Dorms and apartments will be needed to be built.

Of course what will people do when the weathers bad? ... Best build a welcome centre too. Before that tho we'll have to sort out a few basics like water and power so the ground will have to be dug up. Maybe put some high speed fiber optics down while we're at at.

And on and on.... Until we've consumed the landscape totally


So ... you're like ... against the idea or something, right?? Maybe I've just like, totally misread your post ....??
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: KyleL on March 06, 2013
We'll need to feed all these new pilgrims so a McDonalds up there will be needed: maybe beside the gift shop... It'll create jobs for the local community too. They'll also need a few spaces to park all the cars too so maybe we'll reclaim a bit of land for extra car parking.

There's a few quid to be made from schools so maybe we'll build an education centre too.  Even more money in the residentials so a few Dorms and apartments will be needed to be built.

Of course what will people do when the weathers bad? ... Best build a welcome centre too. Before that tho we'll have to sort out a few basics like water and power so the ground will have to be dug up. Maybe put some high speed fiber optics down while we're at at.

And on and on.... Until we've consumed the landscape totally


So ... you're like ... against the idea or something, right?? Maybe I've just like, totally misread your post ....??

I'd say you're on the mark xD
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Rusty Madra on March 06, 2013
My sarcasm dosent translate as well into the blog: we need an emoticon symbol for it! I'm not against the idea of a cabel car per se... I am wholeheartedly against the thinking behind this scheme as I see it.

The thinking seems to be that the Mournes is a product that needs to be sold, developed, marketed and ultimately profited from: I disagree with that mindless and endless consumerism totally. The project in question seems to be pitched with a subtext of wider development...ie an ad campaign, get people to go, get them to pay to go to parts, get them to buy useless plastic junk with Mournes written on it, get a viral ad campaign, get get get!

For me the outdoors and specifically the Mournes means so much more. I'm against turning it into a product in any form.

Just a few ramblings but that's the way I see it
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: LandyLiam on March 06, 2013
Well i'm all for it  :)  it doesn't go very high and will have very little impact (if any) on the "wilder" areas of Donard, but i would even go as far as saying lets build it to the top. It would be a major tourist attraction and restaurants on tops of mountains are always welcome in my books (especially KFC  ;D ).
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: whoRya on March 07, 2013
Well i'm all for it  :)  it doesn't go very high and will have very little impact (if any) on the "wilder" areas of Donard, but i would even go as far as saying lets build it to the top. It would be a major tourist attraction and restaurants on tops of mountains are always welcome in my books (especially KFC  ;D ).

That's a very dangerous overriding factor to judge things by.  By the same reasoning we could put a road from Carrick Little up the side of Annalong Wood with a Cove Cave car park, then sweep the road down the other side of the wood to Rourke's Park.  Sure wouldn't it be just great to see everyone be able to get up there.....easily  ::) 
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Ed on March 07, 2013
Buy some nice wooden waymarker posts, put a tourist information point in donard car park with maps, safety information, first aid kids for sale etc - and let the fatties get off their arses and take on the grinder

If it's there people will use it, half the fun of Donard is the first part of the walk knocking the stuffing out of you and getting you nicely warmed up for a day in the mournes!
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: spin on March 07, 2013
Buy some nice wooden waymarker posts, put a tourist information point in donard car park with maps, safety information, first aid kids for sale etc - and let the fatties get off their arses and take on the grinderIf it's there people will use it, half the fun of Donard is the first part of the walk knocking the stuffing out of you and getting you nicely warmed up for a day in the mournes!


what about wheelchair users and perhaps elderly people who hiked the hills in their younger days????
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: LandyLiam on March 07, 2013
Quote
what about wheelchair users and perhaps elderly people who hiked the hills in their younger days?

This is often used an an excuse to support the gondola (which i do) but in reality these people would be better off driving up the spelga car park for a lot less money and getting a better view. The gondola will be expensive, i doubt i would ever use it. I would love to see a cafe up by the quarry though, that i would certainly use.
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Rusty Madra on March 07, 2013
Would it kill them to put a day spa and a nightclub in too? .... Dont even start me about the wifi problems in the area  ;)
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Ed on March 08, 2013
Buy some nice wooden waymarker posts, put a tourist information point in donard car park with maps, safety information, first aid kids for sale etc - and let the fatties get off their arses and take on the grinderIf it's there people will use it, half the fun of Donard is the first part of the walk knocking the stuffing out of you and getting you nicely warmed up for a day in the mournes!


what about wheelchair users and perhaps elderly people who hiked the hills in their younger days????

It's very unlikely any mountain route is going to be fully wheelchair friendly. So the gondola gets a wheelchair user as far as the tip of Donard Wood. What then?

As regards the elderly, they'd be better served as LandyLiam says by choosing a route within their capabilities. We can't remake the mountains to be all things to all people - they would then cease to be mountains.
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: spin on March 08, 2013


As regards the elderly, they'd be better served as LandyLiam says by choosing a route within their capabilities. We can't remake the mountains to be all things to all people - they would then cease to be mountains.[/quote]



The mountains will never cease to be mountains. They were mountains long before any of us were lucky enough to have fun on them and they will still be mountains long after we are all fit enough to enjoy them as we do now.
It is my considered and personal opinion that the Mournes aren't there just for our exclusive use. All of us who have had happy times on the mountains should be grateful for that and for our physical ability to access them. I would LOVE as many other people as possible to, by whatever means, get opportunities to share the joy that the hills have brought me.  :)
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: LandyLiam on March 08, 2013
Quote
I would LOVE as many other people as possible to, by whatever means, get opportunities to share the joy that the hills have brought me.
hear hear, so many people are missing such a wonderful experience, many by choice, but some by inability, but those who get the gondola up with not feel the same joy as those who walked up  :(

Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: spin on March 08, 2013
Quote
I would LOVE as many other people as possible to, by whatever means, get opportunities to share the joy that the hills have brought me.
hear hear, so many people are missing such a wonderful experience, many by choice, but some by inability, but those who get the gondola up with not feel the same joy as those who walked up  :(
[/i]

What is the measure of joy though?? It's all relative, it could be the most awesome experience of their life. For people who may be fit enough but currently choose for whatever reason, not to play in the hills as we all do,  it could gently let them see that the mountains aren't as daunting as they may have thought. Everyone's experience is so unique and equally valid to them. I certainly have no judgement on how people enjoy the mountains.  :) ;D
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: LandyLiam on March 08, 2013
very true, but the reality is that the gondola is only proposed to go to the quarry, so there will be no real view of the mountains  :( but a nice view of newcastle  :) 

i was once on snowdon on a busy weekend, it was easy to spot who had walked up and who had taken the train (not just by their attire) those that had walked looked a lot happier, and exhausted   :)
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Ed on March 09, 2013


As regards the elderly, they'd be better served as LandyLiam says by choosing a route within their capabilities. We can't remake the mountains to be all things to all people - they would then cease to be mountains.


The mountains will never cease to be mountains. They were mountains long before any of us were lucky enough to have fun on them and they will still be mountains long after we are all fit enough to enjoy them as we do now.
It is my considered and personal opinion that the Mournes aren't there just for our exclusive use. All of us who have had happy times on the mountains should be grateful for that and for our physical ability to access them. I would LOVE as many other people as possible to, by whatever means, get opportunities to share the joy that the hills have brought me.  :)

We certainly don't disagree on the joy of the hills, where we disagree is on "by whatever means"
I'm grateful I have the means to get up into the mountains, but were I suddenly deprived of said means, I wouldn't expect the mountains to be modified to compensate.

Yes they will never cease to be mountains by name, my point wasn't meant to be taken quite that specifically. My point was that we can all talk about conservation till we're blue in the face but if we're going to be building gondolas, smooth paths, gift shops, welcome centers and whatever other conveniences then we're altering (and destroying) the original wild character of the mountain we set out to enjoy in the first place.

Mountaineering Ireland's article this quarter "Vulnerable Hills" lays this out quite well, they suggest that upland work should be for the preservation of the mountain only, not to make it easier or safer to climb - and I tend to agree with them.

To be clear I'm not against greater access or uptake of hillwalking - I'm against modifying the character of the environment we all enjoy and have a responsibility to preserve. Leave no trace has little meaning when it comes to chocolate wrappers and orange peels if you're whacking up gondolas and miles of unnecessary path on the other hand.

Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Mourneman on March 09, 2013


As regards the elderly, they'd be better served as LandyLiam says by choosing a route within their capabilities. We can't remake the mountains to be all things to all people - they would then cease to be mountains.


The mountains will never cease to be mountains. They were mountains long before any of us were lucky enough to have fun on them and they will still be mountains long after we are all fit enough to enjoy them as we do now.
It is my considered and personal opinion that the Mournes aren't there just for our exclusive use. All of us who have had happy times on the mountains should be grateful for that and for our physical ability to access them. I would LOVE as many other people as possible to, by whatever means, get opportunities to share the joy that the hills have brought me.  :)

We certainly don't disagree on the joy of the hills, where we disagree is on "by whatever means"
I'm grateful I have the means to get up into the mountains, but were I suddenly deprived of said means, I wouldn't expect the mountains to be modified to compensate.

Yes they will never cease to be mountains by name, my point wasn't meant to be taken quite that specifically. My point was that we can all talk about conservation till we're blue in the face but if we're going to be building gondolas, smooth paths, gift shops, welcome centers and whatever other conveniences then we're altering (and destroying) the original wild character of the mountain we set out to enjoy in the first place.

Mountaineering Ireland's article this quarter "Vulnerable Hills" lays this out quite well, they suggest that upland work should be for the preservation of the mountain only, not to make it easier or safer to climb - and I tend to agree with them.

To be clear I'm not against greater access or uptake of hillwalking - I'm against modifying the character of the environment we all enjoy and have a responsibility to preserve. Leave no trace has little meaning when it comes to chocolate wrappers and orange peels if you're whacking up gondolas and miles of unnecessary path on the other hand.



Fine words ed
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: LennyJ1 on March 09, 2013


As regards the elderly, they'd be better served as LandyLiam says by choosing a route within their capabilities. We can't remake the mountains to be all things to all people - they would then cease to be mountains.


The mountains will never cease to be mountains. They were mountains long before any of us were lucky enough to have fun on them and they will still be mountains long after we are all fit enough to enjoy them as we do now.
It is my considered and personal opinion that the Mournes aren't there just for our exclusive use. All of us who have had happy times on the mountains should be grateful for that and for our physical ability to access them. I would LOVE as many other people as possible to, by whatever means, get opportunities to share the joy that the hills have brought me.  :)

We certainly don't disagree on the joy of the hills, where we disagree is on "by whatever means"
I'm grateful I have the means to get up into the mountains, but were I suddenly deprived of said means, I wouldn't expect the mountains to be modified to compensate.

Yes they will never cease to be mountains by name, my point wasn't meant to be taken quite that specifically. My point was that we can all talk about conservation till we're blue in the face but if we're going to be building gondolas, smooth paths, gift shops, welcome centers and whatever other conveniences then we're altering (and destroying) the original wild character of the mountain we set out to enjoy in the first place.

Mountaineering Ireland's article this quarter "Vulnerable Hills" lays this out quite well, they suggest that upland work should be for the preservation of the mountain only, not to make it easier or safer to climb - and I tend to agree with them.

To be clear I'm not against greater access or uptake of hillwalking - I'm against modifying the character of the environment we all enjoy and have a responsibility to preserve. Leave no trace has little meaning when it comes to chocolate wrappers and orange peels if you're whacking up gondolas and miles of unnecessary path on the other hand.

I believe there are always going to be pros and cons. I must admit I love the pure nature we have in the mournes however I have also seen how the correct application of a insulation like a gondola can be a great thing. To be honest it would be a eye sore but there is shit loads of mountains in the mournes if you want to get away.
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Doctor Who on March 09, 2013
I think this would be the lazy way up the mountains. just sit and relax and walk the rest. the best thing at the moment is walking from the bottom to the top. best way to keep fit. even known I have never been at the very top of donard mountain as I am kinda afraid of heights. I made it to the wall to face my fear though. :)

some day I will get to the top with no fear.

but anyway if I want to be lazy, I would use that way to get up. but I will never use it.

Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: LennyJ1 on March 09, 2013
I think this would be the lazy way up the mountains. just sit and relax and walk the rest. the best thing at the moment is walking from the bottom to the top. best way to keep fit. even known I have never been at the very top of donard mountain as I am kinda afraid of heights. I made it to the wall to face my fear though. :)

some day I will get to the top with no fear.

but anyway if I want to be lazy, I would use that way to get up. but I will never use it.

I dont think its about lazziness, it more to do with torisim
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: spin on March 09, 2013

but anyway if I want to be lazy, I would use that way to get up. but I will never use it.
[/quote]

I dont think its about lazziness, it more to do with torisim[/quote]


Ladies and gentlemen - It is my personal view that we need to suspend the judgement on people who may use the gondola. What is fun and hard and a challenge for us at this time is all relative to ourselves. I'm in AWE of the fell runners who literally jump up the hills and fly down them on their fun (and speedy) days out.
We have, I'm sure of it, all been tourists in whatever country/city we have been lucky enough to visit/explore and have respected it within our own values. I'm sure you'll concur that as it is, not every hiker respects the Mournes (or other hills) as we would like them to, we've all seen discarded banana skins, apples cores, high sugar food wrappers, cigarette butts, glass and plastic bottles etc etc on high and low Mournes.
There are so many access routes to the Mournes and more than just the route to Donard forest so there is plenty to go around. If you don't like the gondola - don't use it or anything associated with it. Be gracious and be happy to let others share the beauty of the Mournes that we are lucky to be able enjoy :).
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Ed on March 09, 2013
Laziness couldn't be further from my consideration on it. I'm not prone to any form of hiker snobbery, I'm not good enough at it for that.
My viewpoint is only framed around conservation vs convenience - and which we should be putting first.
You were right when you said none of us own the hills exclusively. I'd go one further and say this entire generation collectively does not own the hills exclusively, nor does the next, or the following after that.
I know there are definitely benefits to the proposal, I'm just of the viewpoint that we need to be careful not to be overindulgent in our stewardship of the hills and not put convenience before conservation, if we want to let the countless generations which follow us enjoy the same wild experience we have of the Mournes.
I'm not advocating keeping the Mournes to hardcore hikers only - and I'm only restating my viewpoint to be sure it isn't mis-framed in that context. Equal access for every human being may seem like a harmless notion on the face of it, when considered from the point of view of our generation, but future generations may not thank us for it.
So just to be sure, my point isn't one of anti-laziness or exclusivity, it's of convenience vs conservation and not putting ourselves first in too many decisions regarding the hills.
The Gondola might turn out to be the best thing since sliced bread - but a trend of basing upland work off convenience and safety, rather than conservation, isn't a way of thinking we'd want to spread too much.
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Ed on March 09, 2013
For anyone who's interested, Mountaineering Ireland's draft proposal of upland path management guidelines is available here and is worth a read:

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/14035139/Mountaineering%20Ireland%20Path%20Management.pdf (https://dl.dropbox.com/u/14035139/Mountaineering%20Ireland%20Path%20Management.pdf)
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: ChuckMcB on March 12, 2013
Interesting read Aragorn, here's the final draft: http://www.mountaineering.ie/documentbank/uploads/upland%20path%20principles.pdf
Title: Re: The Gondola proposal
Post by: Wolf_Larson on March 13, 2013
My sarcasm dosent translate as well into the blog: we need an emoticon symbol for it! I'm not against the idea of a cabel car per se... I am wholeheartedly against the thinking behind this scheme as I see it.

The thinking seems to be that the Mournes is a product that needs to be sold, developed, marketed and ultimately profited from: I disagree with that mindless and endless consumerism totally. The project in question seems to be pitched with a subtext of wider development...ie an ad campaign, get people to go, get them to pay to go to parts, get them to buy useless plastic junk with Mournes written on it, get a viral ad campaign, get get get!

For me the outdoors and specifically the Mournes means so much more. I'm against turning it into a product in any form.

Just a few ramblings but that's the way I see it

i could not say it any better, im a tree hugger !!!!!