hiking boots

[RedLeader]

I heard the same thing (from a reliable source) as that article suggests - that liners aren't worth it. The thinking is you are better to save the cost of the breathable liner and use the money for a better quality boot. My personal thinking is it doesn't matter what sort of footwear you plump for, you'll ultimately end up wet if you're hiking in wet conditions so what's the point.

Whilst on the subjects of boots I came across this article on OM today about the virtues of waterproof liners.  Doesn't draw any conclusions, but does give you something extra to think about when buying boots:

http://www.outdoorsmagic.com/gear-blog/waterproof-boot-liners---do-we-really-need-them/7937.html

[DryBag]

Yep, there's a big hole in the top for the water to pour in when you step in a puddle.

[MG1]

I got these boots about 3 years ago they only cost me £70 they have never leaked and are really comfy. When i need to another pair of boots it'll be these one's. Bomb proof

http://www.surfmountain.com/Models.aspx?ModelID=21091&PartnerID=2&utm_source=google&utm_medium=shopping&utm_campaign=Google-Shopping-UK

[LennyJ1]

As you guys know I just got back from Kilimanjaro and my quest held out really well. No blisters and no problems with the Gore-tex. I did get a snapped lace but that was no problem.